| Andrews University School of Education Educational Administration and Leadership LEAD678/778 HIGHER EDUCATION STUDY TOUR (5 credits), Summer 2012 (June 3-17, 2012) |
Instructor:
Robson Marinho, Ph.D.
Department Chair
Professor of Leadership and Higher Education Administration
Bell Hall 173, Berrien Springs, MI 49104.0111
(269) 471-3200, (269) 471-6560 (Fax)
COURSE OVERVIEW AND CONTENT
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course is designed to introduce learners to the international and comparative dimensions of higher education through a study tour program. Various interpretations of globalization and student mobility in higher education are considered. One of the objectives is to give participants a cross-cultural perspective and a global vision of the challenges and perspectives of Higher Education around the world. The course includes Interaction with faculty and students of international universities, plus visiting museums and historical places. This offering of the course will visit St. Petersburg State University, Moscow State University, University of Copenhagen, and University of Helsinki.
II. COURSE OUTCOMES
1. Familiarize students with higher education systems of different nations, their similarities and differences with respect to the transition from elite to mass education, as well as the relationship between postsecondary institutions and governmental organizations.
2. Explore peculiarities of individual national systems and develop more in-depth understanding of higher education in these nations.
3. Consider issues related to comparative education research and the internationalization and globalization of postsecondary education.
4. Develop an understanding of Christian Higher Education in different countries, and compare large and small institutions of different Christian denominations.
III. TEXTBOOKS:
Required:
1. Wildavsky, Ben (2010). The Great Brain Race: How Global Universities Are Reshaping the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN-13: 9780691146898.
2. Johnson, David (2010). Politics, Modernisation and Educational Reform in Russia: From Past to Present (Oxford, United Kingdom: Symposium Books. ISBN-13: 978-1873927410.
Recommended as Research Resource:
Tomusk, Voldemar (2007). Creating the European Area of Higher Education: Voices from the Periphery. Netherland: Springer. ISBN-13: 978-1402066917
IV. COURSE REQUIREMENTS
1. Assignment #1 – Study Tour
Participants are required to travel to international destinations and attend lectures at different universities, and to engage in informal interaction with faculty and students.
2. Assignment #2 – Book Review (Due Date: July 31)
Book to review: Wildavsky, Ben (2010). The Great Brain Race: How Global Universities Are Reshaping the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN-13: 9780691146898.
Write a critical summary and analysis of the book in three major points: a) what it is about; b) how it covers the topic; and c) your opinion of it. The review should be around 3-4 double spaced pages, 12 point font. Make sure to provide the bibliographic information, which includes the author, title (including subtitle), place of publication, publisher, and original date of publication.
Your paper should be organized with appropriate headings, and it should cover the following points:1. Introduction: Inform the reader about the major thesis or themes of the book.
2. The content should include a summary of the main thoughts of the book. This should give the reader a clear idea of the contents of the book as well as the manner in which the author attempted to prove his thesis.
3. Application and integration with the course: How are the information and ideas (theories and practices) addressed in this book related to what we have learned through the course (study tour)? What ideas does this book give to managers and leaders?
4. Your critique: How well did the author prove his or her thesis? Does the evidence support each of his or her conclusions? Describe them in greater detail here if necessary, as well as the author's biases. Was the book well written? What could have been improved? Critique the methodology if appropriate. Inform the reader how this book adds, changes, or breaks new ground in our knowledge of this subject.
5. Conclusion: Do you agree with the author's conclusions? If not, why not? Briefly recount what is good about the book as well as what is bad. Would you recommend the book to others, especially Higher Education students?
6. Be specific. Give details. Try not to be too abstract or vague (e.g., avoid writing things such as "interesting observations")
Remember: There is no substitute for a careful reading of the book itself. Judgments about a book’s usefulness and scholarly value based on a close reading of the text make the heart of a good review.
Assignment #3 – Research Article and Publication (Due Date: July 31)
Participants are required to select any topic on international higher education and write a research article exploring the chosen topic in the context of the higher education system of the visited countries. The article should focus on a major topic and discuss the peculiarities of that topic in each country of visited institutions. Articles with a good level of research support and scholarship will be selected and submitted for publication.
Topics of interest in international higher education for different countries are discussed in the textbook, and may include but are not limited to the following:
1. Globalization and internationalization of higher education in the visited countries
2. The impact of the Bologna Process on higher education in the visited countries
3. Equity and access to higher education
4. Student mobility in each country
5. Privatization of higher education
6. Pubic an private funding of higher education
7. Teaching, Learning and Assessment
8. Research opportunities and productivity
9. Student life on campus
10. Quality assurance and accountability
Participants may be creative and explore different approaches to their research according to their personal style. APA format is required and the article should have a minimum of 10-12 pages (double spaced).
V. SUGESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION
A. Questions to discuss with local faculty or staff at each university:
· How has the transition from elite to mass higher education unfolded?
· What are the relationships between higher education and governmental organizations?
· What types of system differentiation and integration have occurred within higher education?
· When you juxtapose other countries and the USA, what similarities and differences emerge with respect to these aspects of higher education?
B. Questions to discuss about American Higher Education:
Assume you’ve been asked to write a chapter or to describe higher education in the United States to a group of visitors from abroad. What key points would you make regarding:
· The transition from elite to mass higher education
· The relationship between higher education and governmental organizations
· System differentiation and integration within higher education
Every higher education system has peculiarities that are often puzzling to people from other nations. However, these particularities are key to an in-depth understanding of higher education in each country.
VI. EVALUATION RUBRIC AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Paper and assignments will be graded according to the following rubric. Each area will be weighted as indicated:
| Criteria | 5 Distinguished A | 4 Proficient A- | 3 Satisfactory B | 2 Emerging C | 1 Unsatisfactory D | Score |
| Focus & Relevance | Sharp and distinct dominant focus made about the topic with evident awareness of task and a highly relevant and sound thesis statement. Grade: 20%. | Distinct dominant focus made about the topic with evident awareness of task and a relevant and clear thesis statement. Grade: 18-19% | Apparent focus made about the topic with sufficient awareness of task with applicable thesis statement. Grade: 16-17% | No apparent focus but evidence of an attempt to address the topic with irrelevant and poor thesis statement. Grade: 13-15%. | Minimal evidence of the topic with unclear or no thesis statement. Grade: 0-12%. | 20% |
| Knowledge Base | Critical, relevant and consistent connections made between arguments with evaluation of theoretical perspectives Grade: 20% | Relevant and consistent connections made between arguments with synthesis of theoretical perspectives Grade: 18-19% | Consistent connections made between arguments with analysis of theoretical perspectives Grade: 16-17% | Minimal connections made between arguments with little reference to theoretical perspectives Grade: 13-15% | Weak connections made between arguments with no reference to theoretical perspectives Grade: 0-12% | 20% |
| Content & Accuracy | Exemplary research, highly detailed and accurate, with critical evidence from a wide variety of sources properly cited Grade: 30% | Consistent research with accurate & critical evidence from a variety of sources properly cited Grade: 28-29% | Accurate research with relevant evidence from a variety of sources properly cited Grade: 26-27% | Limited research with minimal evidence from a some sources cited Grade: 20-25% | Inferior research with weak evidence and little or no sources cited Grade: 10-20% | 30% |
| Organized Structure | Exceptionally clear, logical sequence and development of subtopics that support thesis with excellent transition between paragraphs and proper subheadings Grade: 20% | Consistent sequence and development of subtopics that support thesis with good transition between paragraphs and proper subheadings Grade: 18-19% | Acceptable sequence and development of subtopics that support thesis with some transition between paragraphs and proper subheadings Grade: 16-17% | Limited sequence and development of subtopics that support thesis with some transition between paragraphs and no subheadings Grade: 13-15% | Unclear sequence and development of subtopics with minimal support for the thesis and no subheadings Grade: 0-12% | 20% |
| Style and Format | APA style, concise and scholarly format, with proper grammar and spelling, publishable. Grade: 10% | APA style, scholarly format, with proper grammar and spelling. Grade: 9% | APA style, with proper grammar and spelling. Grade: 8% | Partial APA style, with few grammar and spelling errors. Grade: 7% | No APA style, with many grammar and spelling errors. Grade: 0-6% | 10% |
PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION
- To educate is to redeem
- Harmonious development for service
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION STATEMENT OF MISSION
To serve an international clientele, preparing educators for excellence in thinking, teaching, service and research. As companions in learning, students and faculty are committed to global Christian service.
The mission is expressed through six Elements that reflect the ideal development for all graduates of the SED as follows:
1. Worldview - Addresses appreciation of the perspectives of others and development of a personal philosophy from which action and service arise;
2. Human Growth and Change - Addresses principles of growth, development, and learning, and the use of these principles to effect positive change;
3. Groups, Leadership and Change - Addresses principles of group behavior and the use of these principles to effect positive change for individuals and organizations;
4. Communication and Technology - Addresses oral, written, intrapersonal and interpersonal communication as the essence of human behavior and technology as it enables, supports, and enhances human interaction and learning;
5. Research and Evaluation - addresses valuing and conducting disciplined inquiry for decision-making;
6. Personal and Professional Growth - Addresses commitment to holistic personal and professional growth.
MISSION STATEMENT OF THE LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
The Leadership and Educational Administration Department (LEAD) develops a community of scholar-practitioners who transform the power of knowledge into global service. Its core values include: community, service, integrity, and commitment.
A. Higher Education Program Competency-based Outcomes
Higher Education Administration requires theoretical knowledge and practical application in the following core competencies:
1. Self-Development Competencies: This cluster of competencies focuses on the self awareness, intellectual growth, and the personal and professional identity required for inspiring and supporting the development of college students.
a. Philosophical foundations – Higher Education Administration functions within the context of multiple perspectives and a personal belief system and worldview that influence their practice.
b. Ethics, values, and spirituality – Higher Education Administration functions from a set of principles and personal values that guide their work, promote healthy behavior, and influence decision-making and their relationships with others.
c. Human development and career choice – Higher Education Administration is committed to continuous learning and personal development, articulating career choices based on assessment of interests, values, skills and abilities resulting from formal education, work experience, community service and volunteer experiences.
2. Interpersonal Development Competencies: This cluster of competencies focuses on the interpersonal aspects of Higher Education Administration that promote growth and development of others and challenge students to learn and develop in holistic ways.
a. Effective communication – Higher Education Administration fosters effective communication in all internal and external interactions, to establish and maintain cooperative relationships.
b. Appreciating diversity – Higher Education Administration values one’s own identity and culture and articulates the advantages and challenges of a diverse society, promoting multicultural awareness and positive regard for differences.
c. Social responsibility – Higher Education Administration is accountable to others and endeavors to see that family, community, and environmental needs are met in local and in global ways, as appropriate.
3. Leadership and Organizational Development Competencies: This cluster of competencies addresses the organizational aspects of Higher Education Administration, focusing on the achievement of goals and programs that make colleges and universities an educational enterprise.
a. Resource development; human and financial – Higher Education Administration appropriately develops, allocates and manages human and financial resources for promoting change and fostering healthy and strategic outcomes.
b. Legal and policy issues – Higher Education Administration applies and understands the scope of a legal and policy structure appropriate for their field.
c. Organizational behavior, development, and culture – Higher Education Administration understands personal, group, and inter-group behaviors, and how they impact organizational history, needs, and goals.
4. Research Development Competencies: Research skills are necessary for engaging in organizational development, assessment and evaluation, and other Higher Education Administration projects.
b. Conducting, evaluating and reporting research – Higher Education Administration understands the logic and processes of scientific inquiry, explains major research methodologies, formulates empirically-driven research problems, selects appropriate research designs, conducts basic data collection and analysis and adequately communicates research findings and implements the findings in the workplace.
B. Statement on Academic Integrity
Students are expected to do their own work and give appropriate credit to the works of others. Andrews University academic integrity policy treats violations seriously. Penalties vary in degree and severity ranging from warnings to dismissal from the University. My policy for academic dishonesty in this course will be to reject the entire product of the student if it is deemed to be plagiarized. Plagiarism consists of appropriating the works of others as one’s own.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ardichvili, A. (2001). Dealing with theoretical and methodological paradoxes in international and comparative education research: What can we learn from related disciplines? In Bresler, L. & Ardichvili, A. (Eds.), Research in international education. NY: Peter Lang. pp. 19 – 37.
Cohen, D. & Kennedy, D. (Fall, 2002). Sacred spaces and heretical knowledge. Journal of the International Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. pp. 8-9.
De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalisation of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A Historical, Comparative, and Conceptual Analysis. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Echevin, C. & Pay, D. (2002). Measuring internationalization in educational institutions. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14,1. pp. 95-108.
Epstein, E. H. (1998). The problematic meaning of “comparison” in comparative education. In Kempner, K., Mollis, M., & Tierney, W. (Eds.), Comparative education. ASHE Reader Series. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing. pp 31- 40.
Hawkins, J. N. & Rust, V. D. (2001). Shifting perspectives on comparative research: A view from the USA. Comparative Education, 37,4. pp. 501-506.
Higher Education in Europe. Volume 30, number 1, 2005. Bucharest: Routledge. Published on Behalf of UNESCO-CEPES.
Johnson, David (2010). Politics, Modernisation and Educational Reform in Russia: From Past to Present (Oxford, United Kingdom: Symposium Books.
Kempnenr, K. & Jurema, A. (2002). The global politics of education: Brazil and the World Bank. Higher Education, 43. pp. 331 – 354.
Kogan, M. (1998). Comparing higher education systems. In Kempner, K., Mollis, M., & Tierney, W. (Eds.), Comparative education. ASHE Reader Series. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing. pp. 41- 45.
Paul, John E. (2000). International Higher Education Systems. Lanham: University Press of America.
Paulsen, M. B., and Smart, J. C., Eds. (2001). The Finance of Higher Education: Theory, Research, and Policy. New York: Algora Publishing. (Appendix only. Copy will be provided).
Reinalda, Bob, and Kulesza, E. (2008). Bologna Process: Harmonizing Europe's Higher Education, 2nd revised edition. Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Sanz, Nuria, Bergan, Sjur eds. (2007). The heritage of European universities, 2nd edition (Council of Europe higher education series No. 7). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. ISBN: 978928716121-5.
Sauvé, P. (2002). Trade, education and the GATS: What’s in, what’s out, what’s all the fuss about? Higher Education Management and Policy, 14, 3. pp. 47 – 73.
Teichler, U. (1996). Comparative higher education: potentials and limits. Higher Education, 32. pp. 431 – 465.
Tomusk, Voldemar (2007). Creating the European Area of Higher Education: Voices from the Periphery. Netherland: Springer.
Van Tilburg, P. (2002). Higher education: Engine of change or adherence to trends? An inventory of views. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14, 2. pp. 9 – 26.
Welch, A.R. (2001). Globalisation, post-modernity and the state: Comparative education facing the third millennium. Comparative Education, 37,4. pp 475-492.
Wildavsky, Ben (2010). The Great Brain Race: How Global Universities Are Reshaping the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zhao, Yong (2009). Catching Up or Leading the Way: American Education in the Age of Globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
